1. Our Commitment to Accuracy
We strive to provide timely, reliable information on U.S. and U.K. finance and benefits schemes. Every story undergoes thorough fact‑checking before publication.
2. Fact‑Checking Principles
We adhere to values shared by leading fact‑checking organizations:
- Independence: We operate without favoritism—no influence from advertisers, sponsors, or partner entities.
- Transparency: We clearly cite all sources—official documents, government websites, and academic or industry experts.
- Fairness and Impartiality: Avoiding bias, we present each claim with context and seek all relevant viewpoints.
- Rigorous Methods: Claims are evaluated via reputable sources, public records, or official releases. When data shifts, updates are made transparently.
3. Fact‑Checking Workflow
3.1 Pre‑Publication Check
- Claim identification: Finance and scheme claims flagged for verification.
- Source verification: Check primary evidence (e.g., IRS, HMRC, official benefit sites).
- Expert cross‑check: Data and context reviewed by finance or benefits experts.
- Editorial approval: All pieces reviewed by at least two editors before going live.
3.2 Post‑Publication Corrections
- Error reporting: Users can flag inaccuracies using our “Report an Error” link.
- Quick corrections: Errors are corrected within 48 hours, and corrections prominently noted at the bottom of articles.
- Version history: We include an “Updated on [date]” timestamp with summaries of changes.
4. Rating System (Optional)
Articles may include a label summarizing the claim evaluation:
- ✅ Verified – Fully accurate.
- ⚠️ Partially accurate – True with key omissions or context missing.
- ❌ Inaccurate/False – Claim disproven.
5. Editorial Independence
We maintain a firewall between editorial content and commercial interests:
- Ads do not influence fact‑checking.
- Sponsored content is labeled clearly and stands apart from editorial coverage.
6. Reader Transparency
- Sources: Links to official documents, statements, and data are embedded within content.
- Engagement: Readers can suggest checks through “Submit a Fact‑Check” forms.
- Updates: Emailed briefings highlight major corrections or clarifications.
7. Ethical Standards & Certifications
- We align with the International Fact‑Checking Network (IFCN) code of principles, similar to Reuters and The Washington Post
- We maintain editorial independence—like Better Homes & Gardens, separating advertising from reporting
8. Feedback & Contact
- Use the “Submit an Error” button on each article to flag issues.
- Send fact‑check suggestions via email to: [email protected]
- Corrections are made public, and updated articles carry a timestamp and note.
